Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phase Displacement Space Drive
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Phase Displacement Space Drive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability, chiefly primary sources, no peer reviews, probable original research, possibly fringe Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:40, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional Comment: And apparently very similar to this deleted article created by the same editor. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:52, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks WP:RS to satisfy WP:GNG … repost of article deleted by prior WP:AfD … WP:OR by subject's "inventor" … Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Happy Editing! — 70.21.12.213 (talk · contribs) 17:26, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Recreation of deleted article. SL93 (talk) 23:22, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Zero Gnews hits for the subject or Moacir L. Ferreira. Zero Gbooks hits for the subject, one passing mention for Moacir L. Ferreira from what appears to be a vanity press. Edward321 (talk) 13:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.