- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Phoenix R/C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Right now this is very little more than a promotional article of uncertain notability. Flirts with speedy, but I'm AfDing to confirm that it is in fact non-notable, and un-rescuable. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 14:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't see any non-commercial, non-forum links on the intyweb. But I have flagged this with the aviation wikiproject as it seems like the kind of software that would be reviewed in R/C hobbyist magazines. Marasmusine (talk) 09:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - A similar article exists, RealFlight, this programme is well known and popular. If these kind of articles are written in a non commercial way with no COI then they could be ok, although having a link to the company site is bordering on free advertising. If it is the type of programme that is controlled by an RC transmitter then it is a training simulator rather than a video game. We don't really include RC and other flying models in the aviation project but these things come our way occasionally, I have suggested an RC Wiki project is started by someone in the past as many of the articles are disorganised and in poor shape. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 10:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 17:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – I cannot find any reliable sources that can provide any notability for this. MuZemike 19:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.