Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phosphate rock island

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Guano. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-25 04:46Z

Phosphate rock island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Stub with no chance of expansion. References don't really support the article, as they're about phosphates but not specifically about phosphate rock islands. Google search for "phosphate rock island" -wikipedia yields 46 results. | Mr. Darcy talk 04:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• transwiki to wictionary, seems to be legitamate (if rare) formation. I'd like to say keep, but can't know nothing about geology to make a judgment. Smmurphy^(Talk) 02:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Given the existence of the Guano Islands Act, I suspect "Guano island" is the more usual description. Choess 00:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• transwiki per Smmurphy & merge to guano, which covers the topic reasonably well. --Dhartung | Talk 18:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• merge to guano, and put in a redirect as this article duplicates the content (in the small amount it has) GB 05:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.