Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Photopia (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 16:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photopia (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 (talk) 03:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Notability has not been established. This is spam. - Boston (talk) 03:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's kind of hard to write a software article that doesn't sound like spam. Schuym1 (talk) 03:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless independent sources can be provided that establish some notability. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 04:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it does not seem to be notable. The parent company that wrote the app, (LTI Optics?), does not even have an article itself, (probably a good reason in itself, but a useful indication of notability). A quick Google search does not place this software very high on the result list, (apart from the parent company itself).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.