Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhpOrganisation (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. as G4, the old AfD close still applies SoWhy 19:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- PhpOrganisation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No sources or assertion of notability. John Vandenberg (chat) 07:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing more to say, really. Barely any ghits to even comb through. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:38, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator, if we look at the Google hits instead of just the news hits, they're unremarkable. Nothing to add. - Mgm|(talk) 11:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable software. Schuym1 (talk) 14:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 16:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Tagged with WP:G4. GNews and GBooks turn up no hits. See previous AfD. DARTH PANDAduel 17:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.