Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phyllis Busansky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - if a candidate may become notable upon event A (e.g. producing a hit single, winning an election), we create it when event A takes place, we don't create it based on some sort of presumption of innocence and delete them when event A doesn't occur. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 19:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

... and another. I wonder how many there are around? Delete. BlueValour 07:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BIO, another non-notable political cadidate. Few relevant Google results [1]--TBCTaLk?!? 08:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. DarthVader 09:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this one, too, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 10:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A major party candidate nominee for a national legislature. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 23:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and do not recreate unless elected (and maybe not even then). SM247^{My Talk} 01:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, current major party congressional candidate [2]. Bring back up for AFD if she loses in November, but not now. KleenupKrew 10:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep'. Significant local/regional politician in a closely watched race in a significant district. Gamaliel 21:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.