Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pi Sigma Epsilon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 12:44, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pi Sigma Epsilon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see notability to meet WP:CORP. Yes, it get some hits on Google books; they seem to be mainly people who've been part of this, not coverage of the institution itself. It doesn't help that the article itself is entirely unreferenced. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant third party coverage, non notable. --Fauzan^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 19:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.