- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:13, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Unverifiable neologism, apparently for a progress indicator: see Google on pibbler Tearlach 02:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not a bad thing to have a term for, but pibbler is not the term for it Tom Harrison (talk) 03:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- They have been called "progress indicators" for many years, now. ☺ Uncle G 04:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! Added to intro. Tearlach 05:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- They have been called "progress indicators" for many years, now. ☺ Uncle G 04:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neologism Flowerparty■ 04:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC
- Delete, neologism. We already have an article under the proper title and this doesn't warrant a redirect. - Mgm|(talk) 09:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Unconvinced - User:RDCwebguy Was hoping to add/coin (neologism) a new word. If it is not to be, delete away. 18:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.