Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PickUp 101 (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PickUp 101

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

M.Jormungand (talk · contribs) tried to nominate this for deletion, but just appended the 2007 AFD instead of making a new one. Their rationale is below:

I have re-nominated this page for deletion, as in my view no substantial edits were made to improve this article since it was last nominated in 2012. It remains poorly sourced, says nothing special about the company (in particular I agree with the "salsa likening" put forth by Brianyoumans and has hints of promotional writing.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that both 2007 and 2012 AFDs closed as "no consensus". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 08:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails GNG as not being the subject of substantial coverage in multiple, independently-published sources of presumed reliability. Company also does not meet the Special Notabiity low bar for corporate and commercial entities. Carrite (talk) 19:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not worthy of a Wikipedia article. Northern Antarctica ₵ 22:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.