Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pin Parbati Pass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. As nonsensical, as it can be.... (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades^Godric 06:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pin Parbati Pass

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Pin Parbati Pass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG References are needed to to establish authenticityAccesscrawl (talk) 16:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 June 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:49, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 17:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 17:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep a WP:BEFORE search brings up hundreds of articles as this appears to be a popular hiking/trekking destination, and seems to easily pass WP:GEOFEAT. I have added a source. AfD is not cleanup. SportingFlyer talk 19:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Per SportingFlyer, this article could be further developed. According to several results in various searches, the pass is a significant landmark and meets WP:GEOLAND. Operator873^CONNECT 21:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, and reprimand the nominator for yet another spurious nomination in a long list of them. SpinningSpark 22:48, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.