Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pine deep trilogy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn upon clarification of notability. Non-admin closure. TN‑X-Man 22:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pine deep trilogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable series of books, external links go to personal/vanity websites. TN‑X-Man 19:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - After further research, it appears that the first book in the trilogy did win an award. However, reading WP:BK, I'm not sure how that applies to the rest of the trilogy. Any assistance is appreciated. TN‑X-Man 19:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep Major award. If the first book of a trilogy (publ. in 2006) wins an award, it is common sense to conclude that the entire group (publ. in 2007 & 2008 respectively ) is notable. If they should happen to win individual awards, one could even justify three articles, though I'm not suggesting that. Considering the author has won previous prizes, and that the award was included in the first paragraph of even the original version when the afd was placed, along with a mention of a significant review, all we need to do is to check that the obvious COI does not excessively influence the article (at present, it seems to need some cutting & revision of language) . There should be no problem finding additional reviews, which of course should be added. DGG (talk) 20:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article could use some copyediting, but award is enough for notability of first novel of trilogy (and logically extends to notability of trilogy as a whole). Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.