- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. StarM 23:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pingg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
An editor tried to speedy this as spam and I'm not sure why it didn't get deleted. The few reviews cited are miniscule and although the article says the site was launced in 2006, this article says the site was launched just recently last February. It is a nonnotable website that recieves little attention on google news. Themfromspace (talk) 06:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I have seen less blatant and more notable spam articles pass speedy deletion, no reason to keep this article as it stands. Theseeker4 (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing in article establishes notability. A passing mention in an article or two doesn't make the subject encyclopedia worthy. ChildofMidnight (talk) 09:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.