Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer Waterland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:13, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pioneer Waterland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, PROMO. South Nashua (talk) 18:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have never been to this park. I am doing this because I wanted to help clear some requested articles from the backlog. I checked the history of "Requested Articles" and found this to be on the page for years. I am a dedicated member of WP:APARKS and created this to help expand the growing theme park section of wikipedia. I am dedicated to clearing backlogs and making the encyclopedia a better place. I am not promoting this ___location in anyway, If I am, I will change the language. I think if dedicated editors can get to this article, it could make a fine addition to the encyclopedia. AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Not a lot of independent coverage found ([1], [2], [3]). Is this a significant enough attraction to be included here? --Michig (talk) 19:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I didn't get that impression. Sorry I didn't elaborate further in the nom, I was on the fence on whether this should be a prod, it seemed pretty routinely not notable. South Nashua (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG. gidonb (talk) 21:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:39, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.