Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pitbull Unreleased

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pitbull Unreleased

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable and unsourced EP. Speedy notice was removed. Tinton5 (talk) 02:06, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#A9. Speedy deletion tags are not PROD tags, and should not be removed by the creator of the article. Pishcal — ♣ 02:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A9 is not applicable because Pitbull article exists. —teb728 t c 04:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hasty delete: Per nomination (and an insult to the language: it ain't unreleased, if it's released). Not notable, to be polite. Hithladaeus (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: While A9 does not apply here (it requires that none of the contributors to the music in question have pages), no reliable sources and no evidence indicating that it meets Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Recordings. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.