- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- PixelPoint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is blatant advertising; it is an orphan page for a non-notable company with all "references" coming from the company website. A clear case of self-promotion. See similar: Volante Systems, PCS Revenue Control Systems. Timneu22 (talk) 23:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam RadioFan (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. The company doesn't even exist any more, having been absorbed or merged with another non-notable company in 2005. Even that merger didn't make the news, which shows how non-notable both companies are. --MelanieN (talk) 04:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Chuckle. Timneu22 (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was going to say merge, but the parent company doesn't even have an article, so there's no where to merge to. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 17:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - but only if it is rapidly expaned with more detail about how it is employed in its user environment, more about the technology involved, and something about similar products. I've had a quick go at improving it: there are thousands of applications out there for niche market solutions and while most of them do not get rave reviews in the print media, some of them do quite well. Pixel Point may be one of these. Its article in Wikipedia might be advertising, and there might be COI, but I'm assuming it was created in good faith, and that it can take its place alongside dozens of similar Wikipedia software articles. --Kudpung (talk) 02:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.