Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plan of Attack (mod)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Primarily original research. Cites no secondary sources and doesn't seem to be verifiable by any reliable sources. Delete as such. Previous AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plan of Attack (computer game)) gave no valid keep reasons whatsoever. Wickethewok 18:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 18:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete The article doesn't establish any inherent notability, and all of the external links are to sites which directly advertise the game. However, the article itself doesn't read like an ad, and "Plan of Attack"+"Half-Life 2" gets 250,000 Google hits and about 420 unique hits (although many of these are just sites that allow you to download the mod, or are message board posts). The previous AfD in no way established the game's significance, so I certainly can't allow a lot of Google hits to counterbalance an apparent lack of notability. -- Kicking222 21:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Featured in three German print magazines[1] (scroll down to June 30, 2005 for the actual magazine scans) as well as PC Gamer UK (which was actually mentioned in the previous AfD). This is quite probably verifiable. --SevereTireDamage 08:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Keep It's had a release and some press coverage. That's notable enough for me. Ace of Sevens 22:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per SevereTireDamage, it's notable. RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 09:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: but cite sources--Peephole 16:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.