Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plan of Study for Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Reason #1: Nominator has withdrawn the nomination and no one else has recommended the page to be deleted or redirected. (non-admin closure) ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 05:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plan of Study for Girls

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very short article, notability not established.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PatGallacher (talk • contribs)

Keep An early study plan for women, and article declares it's a stub; the latter isn't a good reason for deletion. Nate • (chatter) 04:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This particular text was written 498 years ago. Several authors have discussed it in books, and I have included two more sources for the article. If it is still a topic in academic literature 498 years after its first publication, it is a safe bet to say it is notable. Possibly (talk) 04:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update:I have added three more, bringing the sources to six in number. The subject here is widely mentioned as part of the history of education. Possibly (talk) 05:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination I recognise notability has now been established. PatGallacher (talk) 05:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.