- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- PlanningForce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This software product does not appear to be notable. The external links all read like press releases rather than a real discussion of the product, and probably do not qualify as reliable sources either. The article creator has been straightforward about his WP:COI. VQuakr (talk) 07:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
- Delete per nomination. More non-notable project management software. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination - not enough reliable 3rd party (not PR) coverage to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 12:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - I didn't find anything on Google and Yahoo about this company aside from their website. SwisterTwister talk 01:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.