Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plant Trees Series
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
StarCraft-related, not really encyclopedic. -- Curps 05:06, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable Starcraft map. Highly notable maps can be merged into Starcraft but this particular one returns a whopping zero Google hits. --Hyperbole 06:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per User:Hyperbole. JIP | Talk 08:06, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn. Sounds like more of a how-to advertisement. --Arnzy (Talk) 14:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Arnzy. DarthVader 14:43, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, advertisment. -- ReyBrujo 02:12, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep, not an advertisement (there's no commercial gain involved for a free mod-map) and is notable. It may not have a website, but it's pretty damn common on Battle.net. If you haven't been there lately, don't vote, as you're uninformed. Admittedly the article could use improvement, but that can be fixed, it's not a justification to delete (especially when deleting means any better version of the page that's created can be instantly deleted, essentially preventing it from ever coming back) --Col. Hauler 21:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Having looked at battle.net, I still see no reason to keep. Runcorn 11:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.