Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plasmagnetic Levitation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plasmagnetic Levitation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Purported phenomenon seems to be made up by one company (HoverTech) which seems to produce little more than vaporware/pseudoscience and has no notable refrences outside of said company and no existence in the scientific literature. Deglr6328 02:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - only 42 non-wiki ghits. I also searched the preprints on arxiv.org and found zilch. Utterly fails WP:V. MER-C 03:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep use usefulness. Sharkface217 04:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • What on earth does "use usefulness" mean?--Deglr6328 06:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmmm well that's an argument I hadn't considered... hmmm... I'm having a hard time coming up with a rebuttal to that one... :p Herostratus 04:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's called WP:ILIKEIT. ColourBurst 05:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I suspect that this is a hoax, and that their website is also a hoax. Not only are they going to turn air into plasma - which is, basically, material so hot that individual atoms come apart - using ultraviolet radiation (whoooo!), but they are working on an airship that is lighter than air because it contains a vacuum. I just... no. Make them go away, please. Herostratus 04:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete looks like hoax, and links to site are all pretty questionable. SkierRMH,06:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete hoaxalicious. Danny Lilithborne 06:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:HOAX unless someone can come up with some credible evidence to the contrary. --Brad Beattie (talk) 14:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete with a laser powered by cold fusion. NawlinWiki 15:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong, Fast Delete - WP:HOAX (it's a scam! X-Ray goggles from the back of scouting magazines, etc.) /Blaxthos 16:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete LOL TSO1D 01:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as complete bollocks. --Elaragirl^Talk|Count 23:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.