- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The consensus is that this subject meets the criteria for inclusion. However, it should be noted that references should be found for this subject, if a future nomination is to be avoided. PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 10:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Plastic pants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources, and no encyclopedic tone. — Jeff G. ツ 02:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The topic is covered in numerous works about baby care such as the classic works by Spock. The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing not deletion per WP:IMPERFECT. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Unsourced, but I feel I can guarantee that this is sourceable if one felt inclined do go digging (which I don't). This also goes for Rubber pants, BTW - same parlous state of sourcing. Makes one wonder who felt compelled to unload all this information without a single reference, lo these fifteen years ago. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.