Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Player Character Record Sheets AC6
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Player Character Record Sheets. No consensus to delete, but only one participant wants to retain the content. I've chosen this redirect since the target is about D&D as is this article. Feel free to redirect elsewhere if you prefer. -Splashtalk 01:55, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see that a commercial package containing noting but multiple copies of a single standardized form for game players to use is notable enough to ahve its own article, nor that this can ever be more than a stub. Delete I think the entire content could safely be discardable, but if someone wantes to merge it into an appropriate larger article, fine. But there is no reason for even a redirect from this title, IMO. DES (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, gamecruft too finely detailed for encyclopedic significance, not really noteworthy even to Dungeons and Dragons players. (I was one in the Seventies.) Barely a line could be merged into a D&D article if someone cares enough. Barno 00:27, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- And I agree with DES that we don't need a redirect from this title. WP:NOT a gaming guide. Barno 00:29, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to character sheet. -Sean Curtin 07:13, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Player Character Record Sheets. Al 13:17, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.