Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playtech Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Playtech Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Very few sources that are third-party. I did find a questionable one that states the magazine may be defunct. Though it's not certain whether this source is reliable. DFS454 (talk) 11:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The official site fot the Australian magazine of Play tech is: [[1]] The page is still under construction due to technical difficulties —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdalavisa (talk • contribs)

• Delete for now. Extremely rare for newly-launched magazines to have any claim to notability and this shows no signs of being one of them. Suspect purpose of article is to try to promote the magazine. If the magazine establishes itself, it might qualify for an article then, but not before. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 13:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: no significant notability. JamesBurns (talk) 08:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.