- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was } delete as complete and utter nonsense. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Plumbo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
It is a neologism. My WP:PROD nomination was contested by the article's creator on its talk page, so I removed the tag. Unscented (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Unscented (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete protologism, WP:MADEUP one day by a teenage boy, as the article states. pablohablo. 22:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is pure, made-up-in-one-day vandalism. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete WP:NEO, WP:NFT; pure vandalism LetsdrinkTea 22:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Obviously pointless non-notable neologism made up one day. AlexTiefling (talk) 23:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't see why this wasn't deleted already. Completely WP:NEO. MathCool10 Sign here! 02:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.