- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Podget (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not cite substantial coverage in reliable sources that would indicate why this software is notable, and I could not find any such coverage. Sandstein 06:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, concur with nominator, appears to be a non-notable piece of software. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 13:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.