- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete and merge per nominator. Or more accurately, I deleted Podunk, moved Podunk (place) here and then restored Podunk to merge the page histories, as the nominator indicated some of Podunk would make for a good disambiguation header. Might as well give credit then to the authors of the disambiguation page, IMO. Everyone else then echoed what the nominator said. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 04:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a disambiguation page on which only one of the links is blue -- Podunk (place). The others links represent things that are fictional, non-notable, and/or minor enough to be placed in Podunk (place). I propose deleting the disambiguation page, moving Podunk (place) to Podunk, and then merging into that article the two or three of the red-linked topics which deserve mention in Wikipedia but not their own articles (such as the hamlet in Ulysses, New York) — GT 16:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What he said. -- stubblyhead | T/c 18:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Crum375 19:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Nick Y. 20:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 22:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Edit boldly! ie, as per nom. GRBerry 01:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.