Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poetical Dictionary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:57, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poetical Dictionary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for book (or even author) provided or located in a search. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above reasoning. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. (GregJackP (talk) 23:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete, nothing to say this book is notable at all. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 01:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not shown to be a notable book. Mandsford (talk) 14:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - lack of book and author notability. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 18:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.