Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pointer register

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. IronGargoyle 20:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pointer register (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Dicdef, sub-stub, pointless. (I say this as a programmer.) Quuxplusone 05:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (nominator's vote). This might even be speedyable, but better safe than sorry. --Quuxplusone 05:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not assert notability. --Charlene 05:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not a reason for deletion at AFD. Please read our Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Uncle G 09:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to processor register, which describes something that sounds very similar as an "address register". There's an obvious joke to be made here, but I'll refrain. Zetawoof_(ζ) 07:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• It is indeed synonymous with address register. Redirect this duplicate article per Zetawoof. Uncle G 09:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Processor register per Zetawoof. No content worth merging. I'm also a programmer. PrimeHunter 19:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.