- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pokemon quartz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable Pokemon hack. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hacks of games aren't inherently notable; no sources seem to exist for this one. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Wikipedia is not a game guide. RGTraynor 20:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - into the bin where it can join its friend, Pokemon Chaos Black. Marasmusine (talk) 09:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N, doesn't go beyond random fan-created content. User:Krator (t c) 12:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As there are no reliable sources cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hacks are not inherently notable unless reliable sources were to demonstrate so. WilliamH (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.