Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politicizing Science (book)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to George C. Marshall Institute. LFaraone 02:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Politicizing Science (book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unnotable book serioushat 08:19, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Leaning towards a merge to George C. Marshall Institute. So far I'm finding some cites, but not much as far as notability goes. The organization seems to be notable (granted I haven't looked at it that deeply), but I think that it would be reasonable enough to create a bibliography section and incorporate some of this information there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:13, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (warn) @ 10:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google search produces no secondary RS coverage. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NBOOK. Not opposed to a redirect as suggested by Tokyogirl79, providing the George C. Marshall Institute article adds a bibliography section which includes this title.--JayJasper (talk) 17:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Does not meet NBOOK, and while it may be odd to push it to the page, its probably the best that can be done besides deleting the content. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.