Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polyvore (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Grandmartin11 (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Polyvore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am only able to locate a single reference in a reliable source to the website - in Time magazine in 2011 as referenced in the article. This does not amount to substantial reliable source coverage to pass WP:N. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This website is one of the top 580 websites in the United States. If Time magazine isn't enough for you, then check elsewhere. Marcus Qwertyus 21:50, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. GNews lists many quality sources, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] for starters. Subject easily meets WP:GNG and WP:WEB. Gongshow Talk 08:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 09:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Above references establish notability: articles primarily about the company in well-known publications. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination withdrawn - Thank you for turning up references, Gongshow. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.