- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nonexistent movement. If this actually existed as the name for a modern artistic movement, it would yield more than 91 or 162 Google hits (depending on whether you put a space in type 2 or not), nearly all of which seem to be by virtue of its appearance on Wikipedia. --Michael Snow 19:46, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sounds like nonsense, or even just random bits of other art movements copied into this one. Then again, that's what all movements seem like to me. M1ss1ontomars2k4 02:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non existent moviment. 201.9.130.124 15:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 21:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and let it all fade away. Even more pitiful the original author hasn't returned since last July. --Slgrandson 21:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.