Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porcupine (web framework)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 22:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Porcupine (web framework) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find a single reliable source covering the subject and thus fails notability guidelines. Odie5533 (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 02:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article creators can't even bother to provide primary sources, nevermind showing notability. Miami33139 (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.