- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Porrorcore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD — there are zero hits for this in google, suggesting that it is unverifiable and original research. —Theopolisme 01:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - instead of asserting notability, the article actually attempts to assert non-notability - While porrorcore is currently considered an "unremarkable music genre" there is a small but constantly growing dedicated fan base.. Game over, man. Game over! Stalwart111 (talk) 02:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a PRODder. SmartSE (talk) 12:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologism that isn't widely used. No significant coverage by secondary sources.--xanchester (t) 16:22, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable per article itself. Sideways713 (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, sadly. — ΛΧΣ21™ 03:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.