Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portable roller coaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 03:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portable roller coaster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Unsourced for a very long time. I couldn't find any good sources that could used in a Wikipedia entry, i. e. anything that includes its in-depth description or history instead of a simple definition or passing mention. Even if there was a good source, this would be better off as a part of roller coaster. Aintabli (talk) 18:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts on those? Toughpigs (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see much WP:SIGCOV. There is barely any encyclopedic information that could be extracted from them. I've noted two pieces of information that could be cited, the alleged largest portable roller coaster in the United States and their quantity (5), but the sources are quite dated. No justification for a standalone article. Aintabli (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, agreeing with Aintabli. sources say "oh its a portable rollar coaster"
Password (talk)(contribs) 02:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.