Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portioned learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G11), once by Mike Rosoft and once by Jimfbleak. Non-admin closure. Pgallert (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portioned learning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An neologism based on a blog of the same name. Not notable and no reliable sources exist that could support it. Singularity42 (talk) 01:46, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete UnscientificCurb Chain (talk) 10:24, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: 23 results on Google, and description given sounds like any kind of learning. —Tommyjb (talk) 11:01, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable neologism, does not seem to present anything new. Hairhorn (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.