Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possessionless (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possessionless (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

procedural nomination — version brought to AFD: An article on the same topic was deleted in October 2007 under WP:CSD#G12 (copyvio) during an AFD discussion; a reanimated version of the article was PROD'd the day before yesterday. I agree with the PROD nominator when they stated "Not released yet. No sources. WP:NOT a crystal ball." User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, no reliable sources to be seen. Violates WP:CRYSTAL. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn, crystal ball. JJL (talk) 00:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sources. It could be completly made up. KingsOfHearts (talk) 01:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:CRYSTAL, no proof that this will ever be released. Lankiveil (talk) 04:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep per Wikipedia:Give an article a chance. Happy New Year! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 19:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment You can't be serious. Are you on crack of something? --Gavin Collins (talk) 09:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per the reasons I gave when I prodded it. Exxolon (talk) 22:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as this stub has no content, context or analysis and fails WP:CRYSTAL. --Gavin Collins (talk) 09:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Basically it is an spam for the band's next record. --Gavin Collins (talk) 09:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.