Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postliterate society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - see WP:N, WP:V, WP:STUB. Bearian (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Postliterate society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Nearly completely unreferenced, looks like original research, neologism. Correct me if i'm wrong. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 10:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Stub article needs work, but this is definitely a notable term for a notable concept. Frankly, I am surprised there are only about 600 hits for the phrase on GoogleScholar. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Oh, i should have tried Google scholar. It is obvious now that it is not a neologism, so i am striking it out. Still, the article as it is now quotes no reliable sources and has too little content to be meaningful, so i still say delete. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 18:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Seems to be a notable concept. Northwestgnome (talk) 17:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.