Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postmodern fusion
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Postmodern_fusion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
- Delete- No evidence shown that genre exists or is notable, aside from an external article most likely written by the editor himself. C1k3 (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No real references to attest to actual existence of genre. External links are (a) to website of "Spirit Jazz Project" (a member of which shares a name with the article author) and (b) an article by Stuart Nicholson which doesn't mention the term. AllyD (talk) 19:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: WP:JAZZ notified. AllyD (talk) 19:52, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, only apparent usage (other than in this article) is on the website of the same editor who created the article. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only sources, the external links, do not mention the genre by name, or support the claims made in the article. No evidence of notability.--SabreBD (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.