- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Powder game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article is about a non-notable flash game. Article reads as a game guide, and seems a bit crufty. Prod was removed weeks ago. Wildthing61476 (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falling Sand Game was about a very similar subject. Nifboy (talk) 01:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N. There are a large number of this type of game and the subject may be worth an article. However, individual projects are unlikely to be significant enough. Marasmusine (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete entire article is original research and reads like a vanity piece. --neon white talk 02:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet notability criteria (WP:N) - lacks reputable 3rd party references to establish notability of the software. Dialectric (talk) 23:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.