Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerMark Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 05:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PowerMark Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly open and shut case of a local non-notable company with my best search results here and here and the awards are unlikely to be enough to save this article and lastly this has gotten few edits since starting in March 2008. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The awards (those that don't get 404) all appear to be of the type "pay and win and promote" - that is, they exist to allow companies to say that they have won an award. The Stevie awards give well over 100 awards each year. The others it was less clear, but they all emphasized using the award for business promotion. Other than that, I can find the company listed on social sites and sites that serve as business directories. There were a few Bloomberg articles, but these were written by a company officer. That said, the company (if it is the same company) has offices in the UK and Australia and perhaps other countries, so there may be more information that I'm not seeing. LaMona (talk) 17:18, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. trivial awards, and no significant notability in any respect. DGG ( talk ) 00:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.