Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerPoint party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PowerPoint party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable concept. There's gossip-style coverage about a viral tweet about a party, and that's about it. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:51, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's perfectly notable. Multiple reliable sources from different publications attest to its notability. Additionally, the viral nature of the story happened only in January of this year, so I would argue for its inclusion, as it's likely to gain more publicity. 'Gossip style' coverage is entirely a subjective judgement, which I think should be kept out of this discussion, which should only focus on the Notability guidelines, which I would argue this subject passes given the number of reliable sources. --Jwslubbock (talk) 09:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 07:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there are several sources, but they are either not about the party (the BBC article) or merely regurgitate the same few tweets. I don't think we're at WP:GNG. SportingFlyer talk 07:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking notability. Wikipedia's criteria for notability do no rest on potential "future notability"; hence, WP:TOOSOON. -The Gnome (talk) 10:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. " after images of one event went viral on Twitter." pretty much says it. There needs to be much more substantial content. DGG ( talk ) 16:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.