Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerglove (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Power Glove. Cirt (talk) 06:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Powerglove (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Anonymous user removed redection, still fails WP:BAND Cazbahrocker (talk) 06:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.

—Cazbahrocker (talk) 06:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, then Redirect This article was changed to redirect twice now, both times having the article reconstructed. I'm not seeing anything in the article that has changed since the original AfD that established notability as all references are self-published WP:SPS. The article should be deleted, but the term refers to an unrelated Article, so the redirect should be added after. Presuming that notability can been established and the page is kept, a {{oldafdfull}} should be added to the talk page so we don't have to go through this again. Finally, if the redirect is restored, is there a way to place a link to the AfDs to discourage future creation/deletion cycles. Cazbahrocker (talk) 07:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore Redirect - No need for AfD to do that. There was consensus for a redirect, and if that consensus remains, it should be easy enough to retain the redirect going forward. And if consensus has changed, then the article will stand based on no one willing to revert back to redirect. Rlendog (talk) 13:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree, except at least twice it was redirecting to the article for old video game controller and the article for the non-notable band was restored. If not for the name of the article, it would be deleted for failing notability as per the previous AfD. A deleted article will refer someone to the AfD when they try to recreate the article. I'm not sure that can be done with a simple redirect. Cazbahrocker (talk) 07:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.