Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabal Kumar Basu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. This is a bit of a mess. I'm discounting the socked nomination. What we're left with is clear consensus that there's insufficient sourcing for mainspace, but if the author wants to continue to work on it, moving it to draft space seems like a reasonable way forward. But, please read WP:POET to understand what we're looking for. We don't need more references, we need better ones. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prabal Kumar Basu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Lacks significant sources Zinzhanglee (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Zinzhanglee (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Zinzhanglee (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Zinzhanglee (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the whole article with proper citation and reference. Please go through it. All the information provided here are true.as per my best knowledge. Please Don't delete this page and article. I'mtrying my best to make this article proper. I want this page to be published in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dass sundaram (talkcontribs) 14:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin: Dass sundaram (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and therefore WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 22:49, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.