Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Practical Alternatives to Congestion Pricing
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Practical Alternatives to Congestion Pricing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The article appears to be a personal theory that is a response to New York congestion pricing. Without reliable sources, the article can't stand. Tinlinkin 11:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete essay, POV, no WP:V, no WP:RS, does not merit encyclopedia article.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 12:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge This definitely is a piece of indiscriminate information. It would be better had it's merged into the article on toll roads, or something.--Kylohk 14:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Ambitious oung lawyer has been inserting this ad in various articles; let him continue the struggle there. Jim.henderson 15:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.
- Comment How come it's still here? New York congestion pricing covers the matter more than adequately. Jim.henderson 15:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.