Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Practice Intelligence
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 16:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Practice Intelligence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can find no third-party reliable sources supporting the notability of this neologism. The PROD was removed by the author who indicated that more references would be provided. A number of days have passed since that was said, and nothing has been done to the article. Singularity42 (talk) 15:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Mephtalk 15:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't find any third-party sources either. It does seem like it has a chance to be notable some day, but that day isn't today. First Light (talk) 16:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A non-neologism apparently still looking, unsuccessfully, for something to mean: a methodology for the dissemination of direct and reflected knowledge acquired in part of an organisation, to the rest of that organisation and/or other organisations. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.