Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradeep Bashyal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:50, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pradeep Bashyal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG. Most of the sources are primary, written by the subject. No indication of notability. — Za wl 15:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not show notability, sources aren't very good at all. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 16:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is a notable journalist here in Nepal. He has also written for international media like The Diplomat , Washington Post, Buzzfeed. And also he is the editorial of Nepal Magazine.So, since reliable sources are used for the notability of WP:GNGand since he has been writing and co-writing newspaper article for reliable magazines like Washington Post,this article satisfy the WP:AUTHOR guideline. AmRit GhiMire "Ranjit" 16:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 07:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk Edits 12:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. There is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The refs are only insignificant mentions or by-lines, and a performance award by an employer is not notable. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:AUTHOR (the only reason given for keep) cannot cover person because he wrote for Notable newspapers, notability is not inherited. The lead section is also over referenced with this invalid criteria by citing all notable newspapers he wrote for, this clearly shows no WP:SIGCOV about himself per se–Ammarpad (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough coverage in independent reliable sources to establish his notability. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 23:34, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.