Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praison's Last Chance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:58, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Praison's Last Chance

Praison's Last Chance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film lacking non-trivial resources. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 23:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 01:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 01:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Other than some primary sources, I can find nothing to suggest that this short film is ultimately notable enough for an article. The sources on the article are either IMDb (a database entry that cannot show notability), links to places that host the film, or places that are otherwise unusable. I'm sorry Mr. Praison, but it is just WP:TOOSOON for this to have an entry at this point in time. If/when the short gains more coverage, it can be re-created but not before that point. I'd also like to ask that you not create more articles about films that you have created, as none of them appear to be notable at this point in time and this can be seen as self promotion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:25, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no significant coverage found in reliable sources; subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NF.  Gongshow   talk 07:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.