Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pratyoush Onta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Would be nice if some of the sources were actually indicated, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pratyoush Onta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my PROD as it is a fact she's not notable for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:PROD rationale that the nominator confirms here says "GoogleScholar ... found nothing". A click on the spoon-fed Google Scholar search above shows that to be completely untrue. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as nomination makes claims that demonstrably fail WP:BEFORE. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears in multiple sources as a notable author and scholar. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.