Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis day
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apparent hoax. "An Internet-based phenomenon" that produces zero hits during a Google search.[1] Delete as per WP:V unless reliable sources are provided to verify the claims of this article. --Allen3 talk 12:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - Randwicked Alex B 13:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. PJM 13:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Definitely a hoax, I checked myself, no Ghits--Deville (Talk) 13:17, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Hoax. Bucketsofg 15:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete {{hoax}} and tagged as such. (aeropagitica) 16:36, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Besides, exactly who posts stickers about how great vaccination is? -- Mithent 22:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- DO NOT delete per nom. I bet you'd post a sticker if you weren't infected. But luckily there is hope. Prevention is better than a cure. But the post bit means we have both. - Whitecolours Natty G 21:27, 24 March 2006 (Daylight Savings Time)
- Comment: Whitecolours (talk · contribs) has a total of three edits --Allen3 talk 12:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.